lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:09:52 +0200
From:   Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
        Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] mptcp: Prevent tcp_push() crash and selftest
 temp file buildup

Hi David, Jakub,

On 31/08/2021 19:19, Mat Martineau wrote:
> These are two fixes for the net tree, addressing separate issues.
> 
> Patch 1 addresses a divide-by-zero crash seen in syzkaller and also
> reported by a user on the netdev list. This changes MPTCP code so
> tcp_push() cannot be called with an invalid (0) mss_now value.
> 
> Patch 2 fixes a selftest temp file cleanup issue that consumes excessive
> disk space when running repeated tests.
> 
> 
> v2: Make suggested changes to lockdep check and indentation in patch 1

We recently noticed this series has been marked as "Not Applicable" on
Patchwork.

It looks like we can apply these patches:

  $ git checkout netdev-net/master # 780aa1209f88
  $ git-pw series apply 539963
  Applying: mptcp: fix possible divide by zero
  Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
  M       net/mptcp/protocol.c

  Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
  Auto-merging net/mptcp/protocol.c

  Applying: selftests: mptcp: clean tmp files in simult_flows

Git auto-resolves conflicts. Is it why it is considered as "Not
Applicable" or did we miss something else?

Do we just need to resend these patches after a rebase?

Thank you for maintaining net!

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ