[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR21MB1593917C95C95128A4E835D5D7CE9@MWHPR21MB1593.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 16:14:04 +0000
From: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
"sstabellini@...nel.org" <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"brijesh.singh@....com" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
"pgonda@...gle.com" <pgonda@...gle.com>,
"martin.b.radev@...il.com" <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com" <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>,
"saravanand@...com" <saravanand@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>
CC: "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"parri.andrea@...il.com" <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V4 08/13] hyperv/vmbus: Initialize VMbus ring buffer for
Isolation VM
From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com> Sent: Thursday, September 2, 2021 6:36 AM
>
> On 9/2/2021 8:23 AM, Michael Kelley wrote:
> >> + } else {
> >> + pages_wraparound = kcalloc(page_cnt * 2 - 1,
> >> + sizeof(struct page *),
> >> + GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +
> >> + pages_wraparound[0] = pages;
> >> + for (i = 0; i < 2 * (page_cnt - 1); i++)
> >> + pages_wraparound[i + 1] =
> >> + &pages[i % (page_cnt - 1) + 1];
> >> +
> >> + ring_info->ring_buffer = (struct hv_ring_buffer *)
> >> + vmap(pages_wraparound, page_cnt * 2 - 1, VM_MAP,
> >> + PAGE_KERNEL);
> >> +
> >> + kfree(pages_wraparound);
> >> + if (!ring_info->ring_buffer)
> >> + return -ENOMEM;
> >> + }
> > With this patch, the code is a big "if" statement with two halves -- one
> > when SNP isolation is in effect, and the other when not. The SNP isolation
> > case does the work using PFNs with the shared_gpa_boundary added,
> > while the other case does the same work but using struct page. Perhaps
> > I'm missing something, but can both halves be combined and always
> > do the work using PFNs? The only difference is whether to add the
> > shared_gpa_boundary, and whether to zero the memory when done.
> > So get the starting PFN, then have an "if" statement for whether to
> > add the shared_gpa_boundary. Then everything else is the same.
> > At the end, use an "if" statement to decide whether to zero the
> > memory. It would really be better to have the logic in this algorithm
> > coded only once.
> >
>
> Hi Michael:
> I have tried this before. But vmap_pfn() only works for those pfns out
> of normal memory. Please see vmap_pfn_apply() for detail and
> return error when the PFN is valid.
>
Indeed. This ties into the discussion with Christoph about coming up
with generalized helper functions to assist in handling the
shared_gpa_boundary. Having a single implementation here in
hv_ringbuffer_init() would be a good goal as well.
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists