netdev - Re: [PATCH linux-next] ipv4: Fix NULL deference in fnhe_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 2 Sep 2021 09:41:35 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Cc:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] ipv4: Fix NULL deference in
 fnhe_remove_oldest()

On 9/2/21 9:38 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 9:32 AM Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com> wrote:
>>
>> Coverity complains that linux-next commit 67d6d681e15b5 ("ipv4: make
>> exception cache less predictible") neglected to check for NULL before
>> dereferencing 'oldest'. It appears to be possible to fall through the for
>> loop without ever setting 'oldest'.
> 
> Coverity is wrong.
> 
>  fnhe_remove_oldest() is only called when there are at least 6 items
> in the list.
> 
> There is no way oldest could be NULL, or that oldest_p could contain garbage.
> 

+1