netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 13/13] bpf/tests: Add tail call limit test with external function call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210902185229.1840281-14-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Date:   Thu,  2 Sep 2021 20:52:29 +0200
From:   Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        iii@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 13/13] bpf/tests: Add tail call limit test with external function call

This patch adds a tail call limit test where the program also emits
a BPF_CALL to an external function prior to the tail call. Mainly
testing that JITed programs preserve its internal register state, for
example tail call count, across such external calls.

Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
---
 lib/test_bpf.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index f138c6fad5ec..33c3fcc4c9f8 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -12257,6 +12257,20 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = {
 		},
 		.result = MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1,
 	},
+	{
+		"Tail call count preserved across function calls",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, R1, 1),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, R10, R1, -8),
+			BPF_CALL_REL(0),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, R1, R10, -8),
+			BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOV, R0, R1),
+			TAIL_CALL(0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.stack_depth = 8,
+		.result = MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1,
+	},
 	{
 		"Tail call error path, NULL target",
 		.insns = {
@@ -12279,6 +12293,29 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = {
 	},
 };
 
+/*
+ * A test function to be called from a BPF program, clobbering a lot of
+ * CPU registers in the process. A JITed BPF program calling this function
+ * must save and restore any caller-saved registers it uses for internal
+ * state, for example the current tail call count.
+ */
+BPF_CALL_1(test_bpf_func, u64, arg)
+{
+	char buf[64];
+	long a = 0;
+	long b = 1;
+	long c = 2;
+	long d = 3;
+	long e = 4;
+	long f = 5;
+	long g = 6;
+	long h = 7;
+
+	return snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
+			"%ld %lu %lx %ld %lu %lx %ld %lu %x",
+			a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, (int)arg);
+}
+
 static void __init destroy_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array *progs)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -12332,16 +12369,17 @@ static __init int prepare_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array **pprogs)
 		for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
 			struct bpf_insn *insn = &fp->insnsi[i];
 
-			if (insn->imm != TAIL_CALL_MARKER)
-				continue;
-
 			switch (insn->code) {
 			case BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM:
+				if (insn->imm != TAIL_CALL_MARKER)
+					break;
 				insn[0].imm = (u32)(long)progs;
 				insn[1].imm = ((u64)(long)progs) >> 32;
 				break;
 
 			case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOV | BPF_K:
+				if (insn->imm != TAIL_CALL_MARKER)
+					break;
 				if (insn->off == TAIL_CALL_NULL)
 					insn->imm = ntests;
 				else if (insn->off == TAIL_CALL_INVALID)
@@ -12349,6 +12387,13 @@ static __init int prepare_tail_call_tests(struct bpf_array **pprogs)
 				else
 					insn->imm = which + insn->off;
 				insn->off = 0;
+				break;
+
+			case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL:
+				if (insn->src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL)
+					break;
+				*insn = BPF_EMIT_CALL(test_bpf_func);
+				break;
 			}
 		}
 
-- 
2.25.1