| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210902185229.1840281-12-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 20:52:27 +0200
From: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
To: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
iii@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 11/13] bpf/tests: Expand branch conversion JIT test
This patch expands the branch conversion test introduced by 66e5eb84
("bpf, tests: Add branch conversion JIT test"). The test now includes
a JMP with maximum eBPF offset. This triggers branch conversion for the
64-bit MIPS JIT. Additional variants are also added for cases when the
branch is taken or not taken.
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@...finetworks.com>
---
lib/test_bpf.c | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c
index b28cd815b6b7..3eb25d4b58af 100644
--- a/lib/test_bpf.c
+++ b/lib/test_bpf.c
@@ -463,41 +463,6 @@ static int bpf_fill_stxdw(struct bpf_test *self)
return __bpf_fill_stxdw(self, BPF_DW);
}
-static int bpf_fill_long_jmp(struct bpf_test *self)
-{
- unsigned int len = BPF_MAXINSNS;
- struct bpf_insn *insn;
- int i;
-
- insn = kmalloc_array(len, sizeof(*insn), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!insn)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- insn[0] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1);
- insn[1] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, R0, 1, len - 2 - 1);
-
- /*
- * Fill with a complex 64-bit operation that expands to a lot of
- * instructions on 32-bit JITs. The large jump offset can then
- * overflow the conditional branch field size, triggering a branch
- * conversion mechanism in some JITs.
- *
- * Note: BPF_MAXINSNS of ALU64 MUL is enough to trigger such branch
- * conversion on the 32-bit MIPS JIT. For other JITs, the instruction
- * count and/or operation may need to be modified to trigger the
- * branch conversion.
- */
- for (i = 2; i < len - 1; i++)
- insn[i] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, R0, (i << 16) + i);
-
- insn[len - 1] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
-
- self->u.ptr.insns = insn;
- self->u.ptr.len = len;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int __bpf_ld_imm64(struct bpf_insn insns[2], u8 reg, s64 imm64)
{
struct bpf_insn tmp[] = {BPF_LD_IMM64(reg, imm64)};
@@ -506,6 +471,73 @@ static int __bpf_ld_imm64(struct bpf_insn insns[2], u8 reg, s64 imm64)
return 2;
}
+/*
+ * Branch conversion tests. Complex operations can expand to a lot
+ * of instructions when JITed. This in turn may cause jump offsets
+ * to overflow the field size of the native instruction, triggering
+ * a branch conversion mechanism in some JITs.
+ */
+static int __bpf_fill_max_jmp(struct bpf_test *self, int jmp, int imm)
+{
+ struct bpf_insn *insns;
+ int len = S16_MAX + 5;
+ int i;
+
+ insns = kmalloc_array(len, sizeof(*insns), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!insns)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ i = __bpf_ld_imm64(insns, R1, 0x0123456789abcdefULL);
+ insns[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1);
+ insns[i++] = BPF_JMP_IMM(jmp, R0, imm, S16_MAX);
+ insns[i++] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 2);
+ insns[i++] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+
+ while (i < len - 1) {
+ static const int ops[] = {
+ BPF_LSH, BPF_RSH, BPF_ARSH, BPF_ADD,
+ BPF_SUB, BPF_MUL, BPF_DIV, BPF_MOD,
+ };
+ int op = ops[(i >> 1) % ARRAY_SIZE(ops)];
+
+ if (i & 1)
+ insns[i++] = BPF_ALU32_REG(op, R0, R1);
+ else
+ insns[i++] = BPF_ALU64_REG(op, R0, R1);
+ }
+
+ insns[i++] = BPF_EXIT_INSN();
+ self->u.ptr.insns = insns;
+ self->u.ptr.len = len;
+ BUG_ON(i != len);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Branch taken by runtime decision */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JEQ, 1);
+}
+
+/* Branch not taken by runtime decision */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_not_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JEQ, 0);
+}
+
+/* Branch always taken, known at JIT time */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_always_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JGE, 0);
+}
+
+/* Branch never taken, known at JIT time */
+static int bpf_fill_max_jmp_never_taken(struct bpf_test *self)
+{
+ return __bpf_fill_max_jmp(self, BPF_JLT, 0);
+}
+
/* Test an ALU shift operation for all valid shift values */
static int __bpf_fill_alu_shift(struct bpf_test *self, u8 op,
u8 mode, bool alu32)
@@ -8651,14 +8683,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{ },
{ { 0, 1 } },
},
- { /* Mainly checking JIT here. */
- "BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long conditional jump",
- { },
- INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
- { },
- { { 0, 1 } },
- .fill_helper = bpf_fill_long_jmp,
- },
{
"JMP_JA: Jump, gap, jump, ...",
{ },
@@ -11007,6 +11031,39 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
{ },
{ { 0, 0 } },
},
+ /* Conditional branch conversions */
+ {
+ "Long conditional jump: taken at runtime",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_taken,
+ },
+ {
+ "Long conditional jump: not taken at runtime",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 2 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_not_taken,
+ },
+ {
+ "Long conditional jump: always taken, known at JIT time",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 1 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_always_taken,
+ },
+ {
+ "Long conditional jump: never taken, known at JIT time",
+ { },
+ INTERNAL | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ { },
+ { { 0, 2 } },
+ .fill_helper = bpf_fill_max_jmp_never_taken,
+ },
/* Staggered jump sequences, immediate */
{
"Staggered jumps: JMP_JA",
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists