[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YTEvFR2WGQmG3h/C@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 22:07:49 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/3] Make the PHY library stop being so
greedy when binding the generic PHY driver
> The interrupt controller _has_ been set up. The trouble is that the
> interrupt controller has the same OF node as the switch itself, and the
> same OF node. Therefore, fw_devlink waits for the _entire_ switch to
> finish probing, it doesn't have insight into the fact that the
> dependency is just on the interrupt controller.
That seems to be the problem. fw_devlink appears to think probe is an
atomic operation. A device is not probed, or full probed. Where as the
drivers are making use of it being non atomic.
Maybe fw_devlink needs the third state, probing. And when deciding if
a device can be probed and depends on a device which is currently
probing, it looks deeper, follows the phandle and see if the resource
is actually available?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists