netdev - Re: [PATCH] Revert "net: fix NULL pointer reference in cipso_v4_doi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a53753dc-0cce-4f9a-cb97-fc790d30a234@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Sep 2021 10:37:13 +0800
From:   王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "net: fix NULL pointer reference in
 cipso_v4_doi_free"



On 2021/9/2 上午5:05, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:21 PM 王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Paul, it confused me since it's the first time I face
>> such situation, but I just realized what you're asking is
>> actually this revert, correct?
> 
> I believe DaveM already answered your question in the other thread,
> but if you are still unsure about the patch let me know.

I do failed to get the point :-(

As I checked the:
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git

both v1 and v2 are there with the same description and both code modification
are applied.

We want revert v1 but not in a revert patch style, then do you suggest
send a normal patch to do the code revert?

Regards,
Michael Wang

>