[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3162bb35-f047-ddbb-3836-6b048b7358e7@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 14:35:12 +0800
From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
"sstabellini@...nel.org" <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"brijesh.singh@....com" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
"thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
"pgonda@...gle.com" <pgonda@...gle.com>,
"martin.b.radev@...il.com" <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
"krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com" <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>,
"saravanand@...com" <saravanand@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"parri.andrea@...il.com" <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
"dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 02/13] x86/hyperv: Initialize shared memory boundary in
the Isolation VM.
Hi Michael:
Thanks for your review.
On 9/2/2021 8:15 AM, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 10:21 AM
>>
>> Hyper-V exposes shared memory boundary via cpuid
>> HYPERV_CPUID_ISOLATION_CONFIG and store it in the
>> shared_gpa_boundary of ms_hyperv struct. This prepares
>> to share memory with host for SNP guest.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
>> ---
>> Change since v3:
>> * user BIT_ULL to get shared_gpa_boundary
>> * Rename field Reserved* to reserved
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c | 2 ++
>> include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h | 12 +++++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> index 20557a9d6e25..8bb001198316 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
>> @@ -313,6 +313,8 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
>> if (ms_hyperv.priv_high & HV_ISOLATION) {
>> ms_hyperv.isolation_config_a = cpuid_eax(HYPERV_CPUID_ISOLATION_CONFIG);
>> ms_hyperv.isolation_config_b = cpuid_ebx(HYPERV_CPUID_ISOLATION_CONFIG);
>> + ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary =
>> + BIT_ULL(ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary_bits);
>>
>> pr_info("Hyper-V: Isolation Config: Group A 0x%x, Group B 0x%x\n",
>> ms_hyperv.isolation_config_a, ms_hyperv.isolation_config_b);
>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>> index 0924bbd8458e..7537ae1db828 100644
>> --- a/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/mshyperv.h
>> @@ -35,7 +35,17 @@ struct ms_hyperv_info {
>> u32 max_vp_index;
>> u32 max_lp_index;
>> u32 isolation_config_a;
>> - u32 isolation_config_b;
>> + union {
>> + u32 isolation_config_b;
>> + struct {
>> + u32 cvm_type : 4;
>> + u32 reserved11 : 1;
>> + u32 shared_gpa_boundary_active : 1;
>> + u32 shared_gpa_boundary_bits : 6;
>> + u32 reserved12 : 20;
>
> I'm still curious about the "11" and "12" in the reserved
> field names. Why not just "reserved1" and "reserved2"?
> Having the "11" and "12" isn't wrong, but it makes one
> wonder why since it's not usual. :-)
>
Yes, will update. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists