[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210902.113908.1070444215922235089.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2021 11:39:08 +0100 (BST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: luca@...lho.fi
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, johannes@...solutions.net,
kuba@...nel.org, kvalo@...eaurora.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
miriam.rachel.korenblitz@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlwifi: mvm: add rtnl_lock() in
iwl_mvm_start_get_nvm()
From: Luca Coelho <luca@...lho.fi>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:11:01 +0300
> From: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
>
> Due to a rebase damage, we lost the rtnl_lock() when the patch was
> sent out. This causes an RTNL imbalance and failed assertions, due to
> missing RTNL protection, for instance:
>
> RTNL: assertion failed at net/wireless/reg.c (4025)
> WARNING: CPU: 60 PID: 1720 at net/wireless/reg.c:4025 regulatory_set_wiphy_regd_sync+0x7f/0x90 [cfg80211]
> Call Trace:
> iwl_mvm_init_mcc+0x170/0x190 [iwlmvm]
> iwl_op_mode_mvm_start+0x824/0xa60 [iwlmvm]
> iwl_opmode_register+0xd0/0x130 [iwlwifi]
> init_module+0x23/0x1000 [iwlmvm]
>
> Fix this by adding the missing rtnl_lock() back to the code.
>
> Fixes: eb09ae93dabf ("iwlwifi: mvm: load regdomain at INIT stage")
> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>
Linus, please just take this directly, thanks.
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists