lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 3 Sep 2021 09:21:29 -0700
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Andy Walker <camtarn@...tarn.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TBF man page: peakrate must be greater than rate

On Fri, 3 Sep 2021 16:48:45 +0100
Andy Walker <camtarn@...tarn.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I was struggling with the following command line:
> tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:1 handle 10: tbf rate 10.0kbit maxburst
> 10kb latency 50ms peakrate 10kbit mtu 1600
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
> 
> When I altered peakrate to be 10.1kbit, tbf accepted its parameters.
> 
> Looking in dmesg, I found the following:
> 
> sch_tbf: peakrate 1250 is lower than or equals to rate 1250
> 
> The man page does not specify that peakrate needs to be greater than
> rate. This would probably be a useful addition, as it's easy to assume
> that the two can/should be set to the same value for precise rate
> limiting.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andy

The kernel should be reporting error message via netlink extack
but it isn't.  Anytime user has to look in dmesg to see an error
it is bad.

TBF is old and rarely modified code in the kernel. It looks like
it could use some attention.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ