[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4616fe5-6850-1182-dc23-2a6d6375244a@novek.ru>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 09:35:07 +0100
From: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: add hardware timestamp field to
__sk_buff
On 03.09.2021 09:22, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 9/3/21 12:15 AM, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
>> BPF programs may want to know hardware timestamps if NIC supports
>> such timestamping.
>>
>> Expose this data as hwtstamp field of __sk_buff the same way as
>> gso_segs/gso_size.
>>
>> Also update BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN tests of the feature.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@...ek.ru>
>> ---
>> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
>> net/core/filter.c | 11 +++++++++++
>> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++
>> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 791f31dd0abe..c7d05b49f557 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -5284,6 +5284,8 @@ struct __sk_buff {
>> __u32 gso_segs;
>> __bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_sock *, sk);
>> __u32 gso_size;
>> + __u32 padding; /* Padding, future use. */
>
> nit, instead of explicit padding field, just use: __u32 :32;
>
> Also please add test_verifier coverage for this in BPF selftests, meaning,
> the expectation would be in case someone tries to access the padding field
> with this patch that we get a 'bpf verifier is misconfigured' error given
> it would have no bpf_convert_ctx_access() translation. But it would be overall
> better to add this to bpf_skb_is_valid_access(), so we can reject access to
> the padding area right there instead.
Thanks Daniel, I will update it in v2
>> + __u64 hwtstamp;
>> };
>> struct bpf_tunnel_key {
>> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
>> index 2e32cee2c469..1d8f8494d325 100644
>> --- a/net/core/filter.c
>> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
>> @@ -8884,6 +8884,17 @@ static u32 bpf_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type
>> type,
>> si->dst_reg, si->src_reg,
>> offsetof(struct sk_buff, sk));
>> break;
>> + case offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hwtstamp):
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof_field(struct skb_shared_hwtstamps, hwtstamp) != 8);
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct skb_shared_hwtstamps, hwtstamp) != 0);
>> +
>> + insn = bpf_convert_shinfo_access(si, insn);
>> + *insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW,
>> + si->dst_reg, si->dst_reg,
>> + bpf_target_off(struct skb_shared_info,
>> + hwtstamps, 8,
>> + target_size));
>> + break;
>> }
>> return insn - insn_buf;
>> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 791f31dd0abe..c7d05b49f557 100644
>> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -5284,6 +5284,8 @@ struct __sk_buff {
>> __u32 gso_segs;
>> __bpf_md_ptr(struct bpf_sock *, sk);
>> __u32 gso_size;
>> + __u32 padding; /* Padding, future use. */
>> + __u64 hwtstamp;
>> };
>> struct bpf_tunnel_key {
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists