[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a732f080-1d72-d1ee-4eea-5266b5ad1447@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 10:31:01 +0800
From: ηθ΄ <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "net: fix NULL pointer reference in
cipso_v4_doi_free"
On 2021/9/3 δΈε10:15, Paul Moore wrote:
[snip]
>> both v1 and v2 are there with the same description and both code modification
>> are applied.
>>
>> We want revert v1 but not in a revert patch style, then do you suggest
>> send a normal patch to do the code revert?
>
> It sounds like DaveM wants you to create a normal (not a revert) patch
> that removes the v1 changes while leaving the v2 changes intact. In
> the patch description you can mention that v1 was merged as a mistake
> and that v2 is the correct fix (provide commit IDs for each in your
> commit description using the usual 12-char hash snippet followed by
> the subject in parens-and-quotes).
Thanks for the kindly explain, I've sent:
[PATCH] net: remove the unnecessary check in cipso_v4_doi_free
Which actually revert the v1 and mentioned v2 fixed the root casue,
Would you please take a look see if that is helpful?
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists