[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB8PR04MB67958E22A85B15FFCA7CDA70E6D29@DB8PR04MB6795.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:41:48 +0000
From: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
To: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"peppe.cavallaro@...com" <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
"alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com" <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
"joabreu@...opsys.com" <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com" <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix MAC not working when system resume back
with WoL enabled
Hi Russell,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> Sent: 2021年9月6日 17:35
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>; Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>;
> peppe.cavallaro@...com; alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com;
> joabreu@...opsys.com; davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org;
> mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; f.fainelli@...il.com;
> hkallweit1@...il.com; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: fix MAC not working when system resume
> back with WoL enabled
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 02:29:30AM +0000, Joakim Zhang wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > + /* Re-apply the link parameters so that all the settings get
> > > + * restored to the MAC.
> > > + */
> > > + phylink_mac_initial_config(pl, true);
> > > + phylink_enable_and_run_resolve(pl,
> PHYLINK_DISABLE_MAC_WOL);
> >
> > There is no "phylink_enable_and_run_resolve " sysbol, I guess you want do
> below operations in this function:
> > clear_bit(PHYLINK_DISABLE_MAC_WOL, &pl->phylink_disable_state);
> > phylink_run_resolve(pl);
>
> Yes, that is correct.
>
> Please let me know whether that works for you.
Thanks Russell, it works as we are expected, I test both MAC-based WoL active and inactive cases.
And I get the point you mentioned before, if link parameters changed during system suspended, what would happen?
I tried both FEC and STMMAC, the system can't be waked up via remote magic packets!!!
I have not think about this scenario before....
Since net-next is closed, so I would cook a patch set (keep you as the phylink patch author) after it re-open, could you
accept it? Or you plan to prepare this patch set for stmmac?
There is also a problem, we need a fix for LTS (5.10, 5.15), above patch set should go to 5.16, do you have any suggestion?
Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists