| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <318e7f75-287e-148a-cdb0-648b7c36e0a9@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 13:31:14 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
Jason Xing <xingwanli@...ishou.com>
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
zhengqi.arch@...edance.com, chenying.kernel@...edance.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, songmuchun@...edance.com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, wangdongdong.6@...edance.com,
zhouchengming@...edance.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
magnus.karlsson@...el.com, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v2] ixgbe: Fix NULL
pointer dereference in ixgbe_xdp_setup
Hi Feng and Jason,
Please notice that you are both developing patches that change the ixgbe
driver in related areas.
Jason's patch:
Subject: [PATCH v7] ixgbe: let the xdpdrv work with more than 64 cpus
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210901101206.50274-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
We might need both as this patch looks like a fix to a panic, and
Jason's patch allows XDP on ixgbe to work on machines with more than 64
CPUs.
-Jesper
On 06/09/2021 09.49, Feng Zhou wrote:
>
> 在 2021/9/6 下午2:37, Paul Menzel 写道:
>> Dear Feng,
>>
>>
>> Am 03.09.21 um 08:40 schrieb Feng zhou:
>>
>> (If you care, in your email client, your last name does not start with
>> a capital letter.)
>>
>>> From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
>>>
>>> The ixgbe driver currently generates a NULL pointer dereference with
>>> some machine (online cpus < 63). This is due to the fact that the
>>> maximum value of num_xdp_queues is nr_cpu_ids. Code is in
>>> "ixgbe_set_rss_queues"".
>>>
>>> Here's how the problem repeats itself:
>>> Some machine (online cpus < 63), And user set num_queues to 63 through
>>> ethtool. Code is in the "ixgbe_set_channels",
>>> adapter->ring_feature[RING_F_FDIR].limit = count;
>>
>> For better legibility, you might want to indent code (blocks) by four
>> spaces and add blank lines around it (also below).
>>
>>> It becames 63.
>>
>> becomes
>>
>>> When user use xdp, "ixgbe_set_rss_queues" will set queues num.
>>> adapter->num_rx_queues = rss_i;
>>> adapter->num_tx_queues = rss_i;
>>> adapter->num_xdp_queues = ixgbe_xdp_queues(adapter);
>>> And rss_i's value is from
>>> f = &adapter->ring_feature[RING_F_FDIR];
>>> rss_i = f->indices = f->limit;
>>> So "num_rx_queues" > "num_xdp_queues", when run to "ixgbe_xdp_setup",
>>> for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_rx_queues; i++)
>>> if (adapter->xdp_ring[i]->xsk_umem)
>>> lead to panic.
>>
>> lead*s*?
>>
>>> Call trace:
>>> [exception RIP: ixgbe_xdp+368]
>>> RIP: ffffffffc02a76a0 RSP: ffff9fe16202f8d0 RFLAGS: 00010297
>>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000020 RCX: 0000000000000000
>>> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000001c RDI: ffffffffa94ead90
>>> RBP: ffff92f8f24c0c18 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: 0000000000000000
>>> R10: ffff9fe16202f830 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff92f8f24c0000
>>> R13: ffff9fe16202fc01 R14: 000000000000000a R15: ffffffffc02a7530
>>> ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
>>> 7 [ffff9fe16202f8f0] dev_xdp_install at ffffffffa89fbbcc
>>> 8 [ffff9fe16202f920] dev_change_xdp_fd at ffffffffa8a08808
>>> 9 [ffff9fe16202f960] do_setlink at ffffffffa8a20235
>>> 10 [ffff9fe16202fa88] rtnl_setlink at ffffffffa8a20384
>>> 11 [ffff9fe16202fc78] rtnetlink_rcv_msg at ffffffffa8a1a8dd
>>> 12 [ffff9fe16202fcf0] netlink_rcv_skb at ffffffffa8a717eb
>>> 13 [ffff9fe16202fd40] netlink_unicast at ffffffffa8a70f88
>>> 14 [ffff9fe16202fd80] netlink_sendmsg at ffffffffa8a71319
>>> 15 [ffff9fe16202fdf0] sock_sendmsg at ffffffffa89df290
>>> 16 [ffff9fe16202fe08] __sys_sendto at ffffffffa89e19c8
>>> 17 [ffff9fe16202ff30] __x64_sys_sendto at ffffffffa89e1a64
>>> 18 [ffff9fe16202ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa84042b9
>>> 19 [ffff9fe16202ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa8c0008c
>>
>> Please describe the fix in the commit message.
>>
>>> Fixes: 4a9b32f30f80 ("ixgbe: fix potential RX buffer starvation for
>>> AF_XDP")
>>> Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>
>>> ---
>>> Updates since v1:
>>> - Fix "ixgbe_max_channels" callback so that it will not allow a
>>> setting of
>>> queues to be higher than the num_online_cpus().
>>> more details can be seen from here:
>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20210817075407.11961-1-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com/
>>>
>>> Thanks to Maciej Fijalkowski for your advice.
>>>
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 8 ++++++--
>>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c
>>> index 4ceaca0f6ce3..21321d164708 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethtool.c
>>> @@ -3204,7 +3204,7 @@ static unsigned int ixgbe_max_channels(struct
>>> ixgbe_adapter *adapter)
>>> max_combined = ixgbe_max_rss_indices(adapter);
>>> }
>>> - return max_combined;
>>> + return min_t(int, max_combined, num_online_cpus());
>>> }
>>> static void ixgbe_get_channels(struct net_device *dev,
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> index 14aea40da50f..5db496cc5070 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>>> @@ -10112,6 +10112,7 @@ static int ixgbe_xdp_setup(struct net_device
>>> *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>> struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
>>> struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
>>> bool need_reset;
>>> + int num_queues;
>>> if (adapter->flags & IXGBE_FLAG_SRIOV_ENABLED)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -10161,11 +10162,14 @@ static int ixgbe_xdp_setup(struct
>>> net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>> /* Kick start the NAPI context if there is an AF_XDP socket open
>>> * on that queue id. This so that receiving will start.
>>> */
>>> - if (need_reset && prog)
>>> - for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_rx_queues; i++)
>>> + if (need_reset && prog) {
>>> + num_queues = min_t(int, adapter->num_rx_queues,
>>> + adapter->num_xdp_queues);
>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_queues; i++)
>>> if (adapter->xdp_ring[i]->xsk_pool)
>>> (void)ixgbe_xsk_wakeup(adapter->netdev, i,
>>> XDP_WAKEUP_RX);
>>> + }
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
> Thanks for your advice. I will modify the commit message in v3
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists