netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: qcom/emac: Replace strlcpy with strscpy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <163094340525.32353.11305691764552334355.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 06 Sep 2021 15:50:05 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, timur@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: qcom/emac: Replace strlcpy with strscpy

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (refs/heads/master):

On Mon,  6 Sep 2021 21:56:53 +0800 you wrote:
> The strlcpy should not be used because it doesn't limit the source
> length. As linus says, it's a completely useless function if you
> can't implicitly trust the source string - but that is almost always
> why people think they should use it! All in all the BSD function
> will lead some potential bugs.
> 
> But the strscpy doesn't require reading memory from the src string
> beyond the specified "count" bytes, and since the return value is
> easier to error-check than strlcpy()'s. In addition, the implementation
> is robust to the string changing out from underneath it, unlike the
> current strlcpy() implementation.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - net: qcom/emac: Replace strlcpy with strscpy
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/0a83299935f0

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html