[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210908152027.313d7168@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 15:20:27 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "Machnikowski, Maciej" <maciej.machnikowski@...el.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
"abyagowi@...com" <abyagowi@...com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] rtnetlink: Add new RTM_GETEECSTATE message
to get SyncE status
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 21:34:37 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> Since we are talking about clocks and dividers, and multiplexors,
> should all this be using the common clock framework, which already
> supports most of this? Do we actually need something new?
Does the common clock framework expose any user space API?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists