[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 15:39:17 +0100
From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>,
habetsm.xilinx@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] sfc: fallback for lack of xdp tx queues
On 09/09/2021 10:28, Íñigo Huguet wrote:
> Íñigo Huguet (2):
> sfc: fallback for lack of xdp tx queues
> sfc: last resort fallback for lack of xdp tx queues
Patches LGTM, thanks for working on this.
However, I would like to grumble a bit about process: firstly I would
have thought this was more net-next than net material.
Secondly and more importantly, I would really have liked to have had
more than 72 minutes to review this before it was applied. Dave, I
realise you never sleep, but the rest of us occasionally have to :P
-ed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists