netdev - Re: [PATCH 17/31] staging: wfx: simplify hif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210910163816.jsujo3hsw7roerd5@kari-VirtualBox>
Date:   Fri, 10 Sep 2021 19:38:16 +0300
From:   Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@...il.com>
To:     Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Cc:     devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/31] staging: wfx: simplify hif_join()

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 06:04:50PM +0200, Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> 
> The new code is smaller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
> index 6ffbae32028b..aea0ed55edc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
> @@ -306,10 +306,7 @@ int hif_join(struct wfx_vif *wvif, const struct ieee80211_bss_conf *conf,
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	body->infrastructure_bss_mode = !conf->ibss_joined;
>  	body->short_preamble = conf->use_short_preamble;
> -	if (channel->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR)
> -		body->probe_for_join = 0;
> -	else
> -		body->probe_for_join = 1;
> +	body->probe_for_join = !(channel->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR);

Also harder to read imo because this is negative. But I see that whole
code is made for really really really compact so maybe it's same style
as you have done in past.

>  	body->channel_number = channel->hw_value;
>  	body->beacon_interval = cpu_to_le32(conf->beacon_int);
>  	body->basic_rate_set =
> -- 
> 2.33.0
>