[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1631266404-29698-1-git-send-email-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 17:33:24 +0800
From: Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: kuba@...nel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, anna.schumaker@...app.com,
trond.myklebust@...merspace.com, chuck.lever@...cle.com,
bfields@...ldses.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] UNRPC: Return specific error code on kmalloc failure
Although the callers of this function only care about whether the
return value is null or not, we should still give a rigorous
error code.
Smatch tool warning:
net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c:784 gss_write_verf() warn: returning
-1 instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy
No functional change, just more standardized.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c
index 3e776e3..7dba6a9 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c
@@ -781,7 +781,7 @@ static inline u32 round_up_to_quad(u32 i)
svc_putnl(rqstp->rq_res.head, RPC_AUTH_GSS);
xdr_seq = kmalloc(4, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!xdr_seq)
- return -1;
+ return -ENOMEM;
*xdr_seq = htonl(seq);
iov.iov_base = xdr_seq;
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists