netdev - [PATCH v5 bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: Migrate prog_tests/trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210913035609.160722-8-davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Date:   Sun, 12 Sep 2021 20:56:07 -0700
From:   Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 7/9] selftests/bpf: Migrate prog_tests/trace_printk CHECKs to ASSERTs

Guidance for new tests is to use ASSERT macros instead of CHECK. Since
trace_vprintk test will borrow heavily from trace_printk's, migrate its
CHECKs so it remains obvious that the two are closely related.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk.c   | 24 +++++++------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk.c
index d39bc00feb45..e47835f0a674 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/trace_printk.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 
 void test_trace_printk(void)
 {
-	int err, iter = 0, duration = 0, found = 0;
+	int err = 0, iter = 0, found = 0;
 	struct trace_printk__bss *bss;
 	struct trace_printk *skel;
 	char *buf = NULL;
@@ -18,25 +18,24 @@ void test_trace_printk(void)
 	size_t buflen;
 
 	skel = trace_printk__open();
-	if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open", "failed to open skeleton\n"))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "trace_printk__open"))
 		return;
 
-	ASSERT_EQ(skel->rodata->fmt[0], 'T', "invalid printk fmt string");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->rodata->fmt[0], 'T', "skel->rodata->fmt[0]");
 	skel->rodata->fmt[0] = 't';
 
 	err = trace_printk__load(skel);
-	if (CHECK(err, "skel_load", "failed to load skeleton: %d\n", err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "trace_printk__load"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	bss = skel->bss;
 
 	err = trace_printk__attach(skel);
-	if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed: %d\n", err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "trace_printk__attach"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	fp = fopen(TRACEBUF, "r");
-	if (CHECK(fp == NULL, "could not open trace buffer",
-		  "error %d opening %s", errno, TRACEBUF))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(fp, "fopen(TRACEBUF)"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	/* We do not want to wait forever if this test fails... */
@@ -46,14 +45,10 @@ void test_trace_printk(void)
 	usleep(1);
 	trace_printk__detach(skel);
 
-	if (CHECK(bss->trace_printk_ran == 0,
-		  "bpf_trace_printk never ran",
-		  "ran == %d", bss->trace_printk_ran))
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(bss->trace_printk_ran, 0, "bss->trace_printk_ran"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
-	if (CHECK(bss->trace_printk_ret <= 0,
-		  "bpf_trace_printk returned <= 0 value",
-		  "got %d", bss->trace_printk_ret))
+	if (!ASSERT_GT(bss->trace_printk_ret, 0, "bss->trace_printk_ret"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	/* verify our search string is in the trace buffer */
@@ -66,8 +61,7 @@ void test_trace_printk(void)
 			break;
 	}
 
-	if (CHECK(!found, "message from bpf_trace_printk not found",
-		  "no instance of %s in %s", SEARCHMSG, TRACEBUF))
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(found, bss->trace_printk_ran, "found"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 cleanup:
-- 
2.30.2