netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Drop bit 9 from egress frames

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YT92zg/JcC/2s3Ss@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:05:34 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Drop bit 9 from egress
 frames

On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 04:31:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This drops the code setting bit 9 on egress frames on the
> Realtek "type A" (RTL8366RB) frames.
> 
> This bit was set on ingress frames for unknown reason,
> and was set on egress frames as the format of ingress
> and egress frames was believed to be the same. As that
> assumption turned out to be false, and since this bit
> seems to have zero effect on the behaviour of the switch
> let's drop this bit entirely.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew