[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210913083045.1881321-29-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 10:30:40 +0200
From: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jérôme Pouiller
<jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 28/33] staging: wfx: fix comments styles
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Unify all comments of the wfx driver to use the same comment style.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c | 11 +++--------
drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c | 6 ++----
drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c | 3 +--
drivers/staging/wfx/main.h | 3 +--
drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c | 3 +--
5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
index e2d2a64ce66e..b026507c11ef 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
@@ -265,9 +265,7 @@ static void bh_work(struct work_struct *work)
wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used, release_chip);
}
-/*
- * An IRQ from chip did occur
- */
+/* An IRQ from chip did occur */
void wfx_bh_request_rx(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
u32 cur, prev;
@@ -285,16 +283,13 @@ void wfx_bh_request_rx(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
prev, cur);
}
-/*
- * Driver want to send data
- */
+/* Driver want to send data */
void wfx_bh_request_tx(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
{
queue_work(system_highpri_wq, &wdev->hif.bh);
}
-/*
- * If IRQ is not available, this function allow to manually poll the control
+/* If IRQ is not available, this function allow to manually poll the control
* register and simulate an IRQ ahen an event happened.
*
* Note that the device has a bug: If an IRQ raise while host read control
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c
index 61f73b3ebc80..55ffcd7c42e2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c
@@ -38,8 +38,7 @@ struct wfx_spi_priv {
bool need_swab;
};
-/*
- * The chip reads 16bits of data at time and place them directly into (little
+/* The chip reads 16bits of data at time and place them directly into (little
* endian) CPU register. So, the chip expects bytes order to be "B1 B0 B3 B2"
* (while LE is "B0 B1 B2 B3" and BE is "B3 B2 B1 B0")
*
@@ -241,8 +240,7 @@ static int wfx_spi_remove(struct spi_device *func)
return 0;
}
-/*
- * For dynamic driver binding, kernel does not use OF to match driver. It only
+/* For dynamic driver binding, kernel does not use OF to match driver. It only
* use modalias and modalias is a copy of 'compatible' DT node with vendor
* stripped.
*/
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
index c5ba0a50b474..98a9391b2bee 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
@@ -69,8 +69,7 @@ static const char * const fwio_errors[] = {
[ERR_MAC_KEY] = "MAC key not initialized",
};
-/*
- * request_firmware() allocate data using vmalloc(). It is not compatible with
+/* request_firmware() allocate data using vmalloc(). It is not compatible with
* underlying hardware that use DMA. Function below detect this case and
* allocate a bounce buffer if necessary.
*
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h
index a0db322383a3..115abd2d4378 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@ struct wfx_platform_data {
const char *file_fw;
const char *file_pds;
struct gpio_desc *gpio_wakeup;
- /*
- * if true HIF D_out is sampled on the rising edge of the clock
+ /* if true HIF D_out is sampled on the rising edge of the clock
* (intended to be used in 50Mhz SDIO)
*/
bool use_rising_clk;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
index 9e2d08317c9e..668ef2c60837 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
@@ -85,8 +85,7 @@ static int send_scan_req(struct wfx_vif *wvif,
return ret;
}
-/*
- * It is not really necessary to run scan request asynchronously. However,
+/* It is not really necessary to run scan request asynchronously. However,
* there is a bug in "iw scan" when ieee80211_scan_completed() is called before
* wfx_hw_scan() return
*/
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists