[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2jZbJE11JVJkkfE-D8-qpiE4AKi87sfdCh7zAMJ-tiEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:38:06 +0900
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@...il.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Rocco Yue <rocco.yue@...iatek.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com,
rocco.yue@...il.com, chao.song@...iatek.com,
Kuohong Wang (王國鴻)
<kuohong.wang@...iatek.com>,
Zhuoliang Zhang (张卓亮)
<zhuoliang.zhang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ipv6: don't generate link-local address in any addr_gen_mode
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:47 AM Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@...il.com> wrote:
> This is all going in the wrong direction. Link-local addresses are not
> optional on an interface, all IPv6 enabled interfaces are required to
> have one:
The original patch did indeed disable the generation of the link-local
address, but that patch was rejected. It sounds like the right
approach here is to provide two new addressing modes:
IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_RANDOM_LL_TOKEN
IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_STABLE_PRIVACY_LL_TOKEN
which would form the link-local address from the token passed in via
IFLA_INET6_TOKEN, but would form non-link-local addresses (e.g.,
global addresses) via the specified means (either random or stable
privacy). I haven't looked at how to do that yet though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists