[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUHjvKRX76Jf7Bt5@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 14:14:52 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] fw_devlink improvements
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 01:11:32AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Patches ready for picking up:
> Patch 1 fixes a bug in fw_devlink.
> Patch 2-4 are meant to make debugging easier
> Patch 5 and 6 fix fw_devlink issues with PHYs and networking
>
> Andrew,
>
> I think Patch 5 and 6 should be picked up be Greg too. Let me know if
> you disagree.
>
> -Saravana
You are mixing fixes and development work. You should not do that,
please keep them separate. They are heading in different
directions. Fixed should get applied to -rc1, where as development
work will be queued for the next merge window.
You are also missing Fixes: tags for the two MDIO patches. Stable
needs them to know how far back to port the fixes.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists