netdev - Re: [PATCH] perf: fix panic by disable ftrace on fault.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ac31b8c7-122e-3467-566b-54f053ca0ae2@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 15:22:35 +0800
From:   王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        "open list:X86 MM" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)" 
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)" 
        <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix panic by disable ftrace on fault.c



On 2021/9/15 上午11:27, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 9/14/21 6:56 PM, 王贇 wrote:
>>>> [   44.134987][    C0]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc+0x7/0x60
>>>> [   44.135005][    C0]  ? kcov_common_handle+0x30/0x30
>>> Just turning off tracing for the page fault handler is papering over the
>>> problem.  It'll just come back later with a slightly different form.
>>>
>> Cool~ please let me know when you have the proper approach.
> 
> It's an entertaining issue, but I wasn't planning on fixing it myself.
> 

Do you have any suggestion on how should we fix the problem?

I'd like to help fix it, but sounds like all the known working approach
are not acceptable...

Regards,
Michael Wang