[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210916135445.euovk2aelndgtvid@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:54:46 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
CC: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@...ox.ru>,
Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
"bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com"
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 0/5] Let phylink manage in-band AN for the
PHY
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 03:51:28PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2021-09-16 15:09, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 09:36:23PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:30:15PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > > Can we postpone this after this merge window please, so I've got time
> > > > to properly review this. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Please review at your discretion, I've no intention to post a v3 right
> > > now, and to the best of my knowledge, RFC's are not even considered
> > > for
> > > direct inclusion in the git tree.
> >
> > Hello Russell, can you please review these patches if possible? I
> > would like to repost them soon.
>
> I planned to test this on my board with the AR8031 (and add support there),
> but it seems I won't find time before my vacation, unfortunately.
Oh, but there isn't any "support" to be added I though, your conclusion
last time seemed to be that it only supported in-band autoneg ON?
I was going to add a patch to implement .validate_inband_aneg for the
at803x driver to mark that fact too, I just didn't do it in the RFC.
That should also fix the ENETC ports on the LS1028A-RDB which were
migrated to phylink while they didn't have the 'managed = "in-band-status"'
OF property, and enable new kernels to still work with the old DT blob.
Or were you thinking of something else?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists