netdev - Re: [PATCH V5 12/12] net: netvsc: Add Isolation VM support for netvsc driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <850a0129-ef82-67e9-165f-8503da6889dd@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 22:43:56 +0800
From:   Tianyu Lan <ltykernel@...il.com>
To:     Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        "wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        "boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        "jgross@...e.com" <jgross@...e.com>,
        "sstabellini@...nel.org" <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        "joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
        "m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
        "brijesh.singh@....com" <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        "thomas.lendacky@....com" <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        "pgonda@...gle.com" <pgonda@...gle.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        "rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
        "sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "saravanand@...com" <saravanand@...com>,
        "krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com" <krish.sadhukhan@...cle.com>,
        "xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
        "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
        "rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:     "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "parri.andrea@...il.com" <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...el.com" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 12/12] net: netvsc: Add Isolation VM support for netvsc
 driver

On 9/16/2021 12:21 AM, Michael Kelley wrote:
> I think you are proposing this approach to allocating memory for the send
> and receive buffers so that you can avoid having two virtual mappings for
> the memory, per comments from Christop Hellwig.  But overall, the approach
> seems a bit complex and I wonder if it is worth it.  If allocating large contiguous
> chunks of physical memory is successful, then there is some memory savings
> in that the data structures needed to keep track of the physical pages is
> smaller than the equivalent page tables might be.  But if you have to revert
> to allocating individual pages, then the memory savings is reduced.
> 

Yes, this version follows idea from Christop in the previous 
discussion.(https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/9/2/112)
This patch shows the implementation and check whether this is a right 
direction.

> Ultimately, the list of actual PFNs has to be kept somewhere.  Another approach
> would be to do the reverse of what hv_map_memory() from the v4 patch
> series does.  I.e., you could do virt_to_phys() on each virtual address that
> maps above VTOM, and subtract out the shared_gpa_boundary to get the
> list of actual PFNs that need to be freed.

virt_to_phys() doesn't work for virtual address returned by 
vmap/vmap_pfn() (just like it doesn't work for va returned by 
vmalloc()). The pfn above vTom doesn't have struct page backing and
vmap_pfn() populates the pfn directly in the pte.(Please see the
vmap_pfn_apply()). So it's not easy to convert the va to pa.

>   This way you don't have two copies
> of the list of PFNs -- one with and one without the shared_gpa_boundary added.
> But it comes at the cost of additional code so that may not be a great idea.
> 
> I think what you have here works, and I don't have a clearly better solution
> at the moment except perhaps to revert to the v4 solution and just have two
> virtual mappings.  I'll keep thinking about it.  Maybe Christop has other
> thoughts.