[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o88sy2gk.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:17:31 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@....com>,
Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Chi-hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ineon.com>,
Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ineon.com>,
Chung-hsien Hsu <chung-hsien.hsu@...ineon.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Replace zero-length array with flexible array member
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 11:22:17AM +0200, Len Baker wrote:
>> There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare
>> having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure.
>> Kernel code should always use "flexible array members"[1] for these
>> cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should
>> no longer be used[2].
>>
>> Also, make use of the struct_size() helper in devm_kzalloc().
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
>> [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.14/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@....com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
>
> I'll take this in my -next tree. :)
Why? It should go to wireless-drivers-next.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists