netdev - Re: [PATCH] nfc: trf7970a: Make use of the helper function dev_err

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 21:27:56 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>
Cc:     Mark Greer <mgreer@...malcreek.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: trf7970a: Make use of the helper function
 dev_err_probe()

On 16/09/2021 17:36, Cai Huoqing wrote:
> When possible use dev_err_probe help to properly deal with the
> PROBE_DEFER error, the benefit is that DEFER issue will be logged
> in the devices_deferred debugfs file.
> Using dev_err_probe() can reduce code size, and the error value
> gets printed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Please don't send patches one-by-one, but group them in series.

Same response - I think the preferred approach was Rob's dev_err removal.

P.S. You need to Cc all folks and all lists. The cc-list here is too short.

Best regards,
Krzysztof