lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53c85810-4ca5-8475-5f34-43467d018414@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 14:44:46 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: b53: Drop BCM5301x workaround for
 a wrong CPU/IMP port

On 9/16/21 5:03 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
> 
> On BCM5301x port 8 requires a fixed link when used.
> 
> Years ago when b53 was an OpenWrt downstream driver (with configuration
> based on sometimes bugged NVRAM) there was a need for a fixup. In case
> of forcing fixed link for (incorrectly specified) port 5 the code had to
> actually setup port 8 link.
> 
> For upstream b53 driver with setup based on DT there is no need for that
> workaround. In DT we have and require correct ports setup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ