[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d82359a-067b-b590-ae19-d360ccc7c0dd@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 09:49:10 +0200
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
davem@...emloft.net
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, daniel@...earbox.net, kuba@...nel.org,
andrii@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Document BPF licensing.
On 16/09/2021 05.21, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> From: Alexei Starovoitov<ast@...nel.org>
>
> Document and clarify BPF licensing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov<ast@...nel.org>
> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen<toke@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann<daniel@...earbox.net>
> Acked-by: Joe Stringer<joe@...ium.io>
> Acked-by: Lorenz Bauer<lmb@...udflare.com>
> Acked-by: Dave Thaler<dthaler@...rosoft.com>
> ---
> Documentation/bpf/bpf_licensing.rst | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/bpf/bpf_licensing.rst
Thanks for working on this, it is good this gets clarified.
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists