netdev - Re: [PATCH 08/24] tools: bpftool: update bpftool-prog.rst reference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:43:45 +0100
From:   Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Beckett <david.beckett@...ronome.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] tools: bpftool: update bpftool-prog.rst reference

2021-09-16 11:14 UTC+0200 ~ Mauro Carvalho Chehab
<mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> The file name: Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> should be, instead: tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst.
> 
> Update its cross-reference accordingly.
> 
> Fixes: a2b5944fb4e0 ("selftests/bpf: Check consistency between bpftool source, doc, completion")
> Fixes: ff69c21a85a4 ("tools: bpftool: add documentation")

Hi,
How is this a fix for the commit that added the documentation in bpftool?

> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py
> index be54b7335a76..27a2c369a798 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py
> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ class ManProgExtractor(ManPageExtractor):
>      """
>      An extractor for bpftool-prog.rst.
>      """
> -    filename = os.path.join(BPFTOOL_DIR, 'Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst')
> +    filename = os.path.join(BPFTOOL_DIR, 'tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst')
>  
>      def get_attach_types(self):
>          return self.get_rst_list('ATTACH_TYPE')
> 

No I don't believe it should. BPFTOOL_DIR already contains
'tools/bpf/bpftool' and the os.path.join() concatenates the two path
fragments.

Where is this suggestion coming from? Did you face an issue with the script?

Same comment applies for the next two patches.

Quentin