Date:   Fri, 17 Sep 2021 02:34:37 +0000
From:   Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
CC:     Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 net] net: mscc: ocelot: remove buggy and useless write
 to ANA_PFC_PFC_CFG


Hi Vladimir,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> Sent: 2021年9月16日 19:49
> To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
> Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>; Alexandre Belloni
> <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>; UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com; David S.
> Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net] net: mscc: ocelot: remove buggy and useless write
> to ANA_PFC_PFC_CFG
> 
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 06:09:37PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:
> > A useless write to ANA_PFC_PFC_CFG was left in while refactoring
> > ocelot to phylink. Since priority flow control is disabled, writing
> > the speed has no effect.
> >
> > Further, it was using ethtool.h SPEED_ instead of OCELOT_SPEED_
> > macros, which are incorrectly offset for GENMASK.
> >
> > Lastly, for priority flow control to properly function, some scenarios
> > would rely on the rate adaptation from the PCS while the MAC speed
> > would be fixed. So it isn't used, and even if it was, neither "speed"
> > nor "mac_speed" are necessarily the correct values to be used.
> >
> > Fixes: e6e12df625f2 ("net: mscc: ocelot: convert to phylink")
> > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c | 4 ----
> >  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c
> > index c581b955efb3..08be0440af28 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c
> > @@ -569,10 +569,6 @@ void ocelot_phylink_mac_link_up(struct ocelot
> *ocelot, int port,
> >  	ocelot_port_writel(ocelot_port, DEV_CLOCK_CFG_LINK_SPEED(speed),
> >  			   DEV_CLOCK_CFG);
> >
> > -	/* No PFC */
> > -	ocelot_write_gix(ocelot, ANA_PFC_PFC_CFG_FC_LINK_SPEED(speed),
> > -			 ANA_PFC_PFC_CFG, port);
> > -
> 
> This will conflict with the other patch.... why didn't you send both as part of a
> series? By not doing that, you are telling patchwork to build-test them in
> parallel, which of course does not work:
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatchw
> ork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Fnetdevbpf%2Fpatch%2F20210916012341.518512-
> 1-colin.foster%40in-advantage.com%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cqiangqing.zh
> ang%40nxp.com%7C546aa03ab17b45f0891a08d97908095f%7C686ea1d3bc2b
> 4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637673897688805938%7CUnknown%7
> CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiL
> CJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&amp;sdata=fmGI6K2dS36tm5xuuKLKdVF1pEj9umv
> FLA8kyfXWD3A%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> Also, why didn't you bump the version counter of the patch, and we're still at v1
> despite the earlier attempt?
> 
> git format-patch -2 --cover-letter --subject-prefix="PATCH v3 net" -o
> /opt/patches/linux/ocelot-phylink-fixes/v3/
> ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl /opt/patches/linux/ocelot-phylink-fixes/v3/*.patch
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict
> /opt/patches/linux/ocelot-phylink-fixes/v3/*.patch
> # Go through patches, write change log compared to v2 using vimdiff, meld, git
> range-diff, whatever # Write cover letter summarizing what changes and why.
> If fixing bugs explain the impact.
> git send-email \
> 	--to='netdev@...r.kernel.org' \
> 	--to='linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org' \
> 	--cc='Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>' \
> 	--cc='Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>' \
> 	--cc='Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>' \
> 	--cc='UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com' \
> 	--cc='"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>' \
> 	--cc='Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>' \
> 	/opt/patches/linux/ocelot-phylink-fixes/v3/*.patch
> 
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> 
> Please keep this tag but resend a new version. You can download the patch
> with the review tags automatically using:
> git b4 20210916010938.517698-1-colin.foster@...advantage.com
> git b4 20210916012341.518512-1-colin.foster@...advantage.com
> 
> where "git b4" is an alias configured like this in ~/.gitconfig:
> 
> [b4]
> 	midmask =
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.ker
> nel.org%2Fr%2F%2525s&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cqiangqing.zhang%40nxp.co
> m%7C546aa03ab17b45f0891a08d97908095f%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5
> c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637673897688815892%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
> 8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3
> D%7C1000&amp;sdata=t8N%2F%2FAnLVLtoMDzNDL%2Fv7ixEkBeiIqB6Go%2F
> zD19gisE%3D&amp;reserved=0
> [alias]
> 	b4 = "!f() { b4 am -t -o - $@ | git am -3; }; f"

I came across this detailed suggestions, sometime we need download the patch from the patchwork,
so I have a try with above method(adding these two symbol in my .gitconfig), but I met below error,
could you please tell me what I am missing? Thanks.

$ git b4 20210916010938.517698-1-colin.foster@...advantage.com
f() { b4 am -t -o - $@ | git am -3; }; f: 1: f() { b4 am -t -o - $@ | git am -3; }; f: b4: not found

Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists