netdev - [PATCH v2 6/8] bpf ppc64: Add addr > TASK_SIZE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210917153047.177141-7-hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Sep 2021 21:00:45 +0530
From:   Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, paulus@...ba.org, andrii@...nel.org,
        kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/8] bpf ppc64: Add addr > TASK_SIZE_MAX explicit check

From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>

On PPC64 with KUAP enabled, any kernel code which wants to
access userspace needs to be surrounded by disable-enable KUAP.
But that is not happening for BPF_PROBE_MEM load instruction.
So, when BPF program tries to access invalid userspace address,
page-fault handler considers it as bad KUAP fault:

  Kernel attempted to read user page (d0000000) - exploit attempt? (uid: 0)

Considering the fact that PTR_TO_BTF_ID (which uses BPF_PROBE_MEM
mode) could either be a valid kernel pointer or NULL but should
never be a pointer to userspace address, execute BPF_PROBE_MEM load
only if addr > TASK_SIZE_MAX, otherwise set dst_reg=0 and move on.

This will catch NULL, valid or invalid userspace pointers. Only bad
kernel pointer will be handled by BPF exception table.

[Alexei suggested for x86]
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>
---

Changes in v2:
* Refactored the code based on Christophe's comments.


 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 2fc10995f243..eb28dbc67151 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -769,6 +769,29 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *
 		/* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + off) */
 		case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
 		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_DW:
+			/*
+			 * As PTR_TO_BTF_ID that uses BPF_PROBE_MEM mode could either be a valid
+			 * kernel pointer or NULL but not a userspace address, execute BPF_PROBE_MEM
+			 * load only if addr > TASK_SIZE_MAX, otherwise set dst_reg=0 and move on.
+			 */
+			if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
+				unsigned int adjusted_idx;
+
+				/*
+				 * Check if 'off' is word aligned because PPC_BPF_LL()
+				 * (BPF_DW case) generates two instructions if 'off' is not
+				 * word-aligned and one instruction otherwise.
+				 */
+				adjusted_idx = ((BPF_SIZE(code) == BPF_DW) && (off & 3)) ? 1 : 0;
+
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[TMP_REG_1], src_reg, off));
+				PPC_LI64(b2p[TMP_REG_2], TASK_SIZE_MAX);
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_CMPLD(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_2]));
+				PPC_BCC(COND_GT, (ctx->idx + 4) * 4);
+				EMIT(PPC_RAW_LI(dst_reg, 0));
+				PPC_JMP((ctx->idx + 2 + adjusted_idx) * 4);
+			}
+
 			switch (size) {
 			case BPF_B:
 				EMIT(PPC_RAW_LBZ(dst_reg, src_reg, off));
-- 
2.31.1