[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20c47a57-e7d7-d791-5c86-e27310672789@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:01:42 -0700
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: Hao Chen <chenhaoa@...ontech.com>
CC: <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next,v1] net: e1000e: solve insmod 'Unknown symbol
mutex_lock' error
On 9/17/2021 7:11 AM, Hao Chen wrote:
> After I turn on the CONFIG_LOCK_STAT=y, insmod e1000e.ko will report:
> [ 5.641579] e1000e: Unknown symbol mutex_lock (err -2)
> [ 90.775705] e1000e: Unknown symbol mutex_lock (err -2)
> [ 132.252339] e1000e: Unknown symbol mutex_lock (err -2)
>
> This problem fixed after include <linux/mutex.h>.
Thanks for taking the time to send a patch.
Why do you think including a file will fix this? That error is usually
the user's fault for trying to use insmod which doesn't check module
dependencies.
The advice I usually give is to try modprobe instead, does the problem
still occur without this patch and just using modprobe?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists