netdev - Re: [PATCH v14 bpf-next 10/18] bpf: add multi-buff support to the bpf_xdp_adjust

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Sep 2021 12:02:46 +0200
From:   Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, shayagr@...zon.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        dsahern@...nel.org, brouer@...hat.com, echaudro@...hat.com,
        jasowang@...hat.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com, saeed@...nel.org,
        maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
        tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com, toke@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 bpf-next 10/18] bpf: add multi-buff support to the
 bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API

On Sep 16, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 18:14:16 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > From: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
> > 
> > This change adds support for tail growing and shrinking for XDP multi-buff.
> > 
> > When called on a multi-buffer packet with a grow request, it will always
> > work on the last fragment of the packet. So the maximum grow size is the
> > last fragments tailroom, i.e. no new buffer will be allocated.
> > 
> > When shrinking, it will work from the last fragment, all the way down to
> > the base buffer depending on the shrinking size. It's important to mention
> > that once you shrink down the fragment(s) are freed, so you can not grow
> > again to the original size.
> > 
> > Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@...hat.com>
> 
> > +static inline unsigned int xdp_get_frag_tailroom(const skb_frag_t *frag)
> > +{
> > +	struct page *page = skb_frag_page(frag);
> > +
> > +	return page_size(page) - skb_frag_size(frag) - skb_frag_off(frag);
> > +}
> 
> How do we deal with NICs which can pack multiple skbs into a page frag?
> skb_shared_info field to mark the end of last fragment? Just want to make 
> sure there is a path to supporting such designs.

I guess here, intead of using page_size(page) we can rely on xdp_buff->frame_sz
or even on skb_shared_info()->xdp_frag_truesize (assuming all fragments from a
given hw have the same truesize, but I think this is something we can rely on)

static inline unsigned int xdp_get_frag_tailroom(struct xdp_buff *xdp,
						 const skb_frag_t *frag)
{
	return xdp->frame_sz - skb_frag_size(frag) - skb_frag_off(frag);
}

what do you think?

> 
> > +static int bpf_xdp_mb_adjust_tail(struct xdp_buff *xdp, int offset)
> > +{
> > +	struct skb_shared_info *sinfo;
> > +
> > +	sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(xdp);
> > +	if (offset >= 0) {
> > +		skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[sinfo->nr_frags - 1];
> > +		int size;
> > +
> > +		if (unlikely(offset > xdp_get_frag_tailroom(frag)))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +		size = skb_frag_size(frag);
> > +		memset(skb_frag_address(frag) + size, 0, offset);
> > +		skb_frag_size_set(frag, size + offset);
> > +		sinfo->xdp_frags_size += offset;
> > +	} else {
> > +		int i, n_frags_free = 0, len_free = 0, tlen_free = 0;
> > +
> > +		offset = abs(offset);
> > +		if (unlikely(offset > ((int)(xdp->data_end - xdp->data) +
> > +				       sinfo->xdp_frags_size - ETH_HLEN)))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +		for (i = sinfo->nr_frags - 1; i >= 0 && offset > 0; i--) {
> > +			skb_frag_t *frag = &sinfo->frags[i];
> > +			int size = skb_frag_size(frag);
> > +			int shrink = min_t(int, offset, size);
> > +
> > +			len_free += shrink;
> > +			offset -= shrink;
> > +
> > +			if (unlikely(size == shrink)) {
> > +				struct page *page = skb_frag_page(frag);
> > +
> > +				__xdp_return(page_address(page), &xdp->rxq->mem,
> > +					     false, NULL);
> > +				tlen_free += page_size(page);
> > +				n_frags_free++;
> > +			} else {
> > +				skb_frag_size_set(frag, size - shrink);
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> > +		}
> > +		sinfo->nr_frags -= n_frags_free;
> > +		sinfo->xdp_frags_size -= len_free;
> > +		sinfo->xdp_frags_truesize -= tlen_free;
> > +
> > +		if (unlikely(offset > 0)) {
> > +			xdp_buff_clear_mb(xdp);
> > +			xdp->data_end -= offset;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> nit: most of this function is indented, situation is ripe for splitting
>      it into two

sure, I will fix it.

Regards,
Lorenzo


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)