[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210918020958.1167652-1-houtao1@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 10:09:55 +0800
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
CC: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <houtao1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] add support for writable bare tracepoint
Hi,
The patchset series supports writable context for bare tracepoint.
The main idea comes from patchset "writable contexts for bpf raw
tracepoints" [1], but it only supports normal tracepoint with
associated trace event under tracefs. Now we want to add a
bare tracepoint in VFS layer, and update file::f_mode for specific
files. The reason using bare tracepoint is that it doesn't form
a ABI and we can change it freely. So add support for it in BPF.
Any comments are welcome.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190426184951.21812-1-mmullins@fb.com
Change log:
v2:
* rebase on bpf-next tree
* address comments from Yonghong Song
* rename bpf_testmode_test_writable_ctx::ret as early_ret to reflect
its purpose better.
v1:
* https://www.spinics.net/lists/bpf/msg46221.html
Hou Tao (3):
bpf: support writable context for bare tracepoint
libbpf: support detecting and attaching of writable tracepoint program
bpf/selftests: add test for writable bare tracepoint
include/trace/bpf_probe.h | 19 +++++++---
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 4 +++
.../bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod-events.h | 15 ++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c | 10 ++++++
.../selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.h | 5 +++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/module_attach.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/test_module_attach.c | 14 ++++++++
7 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists