[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o88nwg74.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:05:03 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Srinivasan Raju <srini.raju@...elifi.com>
Cc: mostafa.afgani@...elifi.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list),
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS (WIRELESS)),
netdev@...r.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v15] wireless: Initial driver submission for pureLiFi STA devices
(big picture comments first)
Srinivasan Raju <srini.raju@...elifi.com> writes:
> This introduces the pureLiFi LiFi driver for LiFi-X, LiFi-XC
> and LiFi-XL USB devices.
>
> This driver implementation has been based on the zd1211rw driver.
>
> Driver is based on 802.11 softMAC Architecture and uses
> native 802.11 for configuration and management.
>
> The driver is compiled and tested in ARM, x86 architectures and
> compiled in powerpc architecture.
You should describe in the commit log what LiFi means, not everyone know
the term and might mistake this as a regular Wi-Fi device (which it's
not).
> + hw->wiphy->bands[NL80211_BAND_2GHZ] = &mac->band;
Johannes comment about piggy-backing NL80211_BAND_2GHZ is not yet addressed:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20210212115030.124490-1-srini.raju@purelifi.com/
I agree with Johannes, a Li-Fi driver should not claim to be a regular
2.4 GHz Wi-Fi device.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists