netdev - Re: [PATCH net v8] skb_expand_head() adjust skb->truesize incorrectly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45b3cb13-8c6e-25a3-f568-921ab6f1ca8f@virtuozzo.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:21:14 +0300
From:   Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To:     Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...nvz.org, Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v8] skb_expand_head() adjust skb->truesize incorrectly

On 9/21/21 12:41 AM, Vasily Averin wrote:
> Christoph Paasch reports [1] about incorrect skb->truesize
> after skb_expand_head() call in ip6_xmit.
> This may happen because of two reasons:
> - skb_set_owner_w() for newly cloned skb is called too early,
> before pskb_expand_head() where truesize is adjusted for (!skb-sk) case.
> - pskb_expand_head() does not adjust truesize in (skb->sk) case.
> In this case sk->sk_wmem_alloc should be adjusted too.
> 
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/8/20/1082
> 
> Fixes: f1260ff15a71 ("skbuff: introduce skb_expand_head()")
> Fixes: 2d85a1b31dde ("ipv6: ip6_finish_output2: set sk into newly allocated nskb")
> Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
> ---
> v8: clone non-wmem skb
> V7 (from kuba@):
>     shift more magic into helpers,
>     follow Eric's advice and don't inherit non-wmem skbs for now
> v6: fixed delta,
>     improved comments
> v5: fixed else condition, thanks to Eric
>     reworked update of expanded skb,
>     added corresponding comments
> v4: decided to use is_skb_wmem() after pskb_expand_head() call
>     fixed 'return (EXPRESSION);' in os_skb_wmem according to Eric Dumazet
> v3: removed __pskb_expand_head(),
>     added is_skb_wmem() helper for skb with wmem-compatible destructors
>     there are 2 ways to use it:
>      - before pskb_expand_head(), to create skb clones
>      - after successfull pskb_expand_head() to change owner on extended skb.
> v2: based on patch version from Eric Dumazet,
>     added __pskb_expand_head() function, which can be forced
>     to adjust skb->truesize and sk->sk_wmem_alloc.
> ---
>  include/net/sock.h |  1 +
>  net/core/skbuff.c  | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  net/core/sock.c    |  8 ++++++++
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
> index 95b2577..173d58c 100644
> --- a/include/net/sock.h
> +++ b/include/net/sock.h
> @@ -1695,6 +1695,7 @@ struct sk_buff *sock_wmalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size, int force,
>  			     gfp_t priority);
>  void __sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb);
>  void sock_wfree(struct sk_buff *skb);
> +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb);
>  struct sk_buff *sock_omalloc(struct sock *sk, unsigned long size,
>  			     gfp_t priority);
>  void skb_orphan_partial(struct sk_buff *skb);
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index f931176..4b49f63 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -1804,30 +1804,39 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_realloc_headroom(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom)
>  struct sk_buff *skb_expand_head(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int headroom)
>  {
>  	int delta = headroom - skb_headroom(skb);
> +	int osize = skb_end_offset(skb);
> +	struct sock *sk = skb->sk;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ONCE(delta <= 0,
>  		      "%s is expecting an increase in the headroom", __func__))
>  		return skb;
>  
> +	delta = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta);
>  	/* pskb_expand_head() might crash, if skb is shared */
> -	if (skb_shared(skb)) {
> +	if (skb_shared(skb) || !is_skb_wmem(skb)) {
>  		struct sk_buff *nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>  
> -		if (likely(nskb)) {
> -			if (skb->sk)
> -				skb_set_owner_w(nskb, skb->sk);
> -			consume_skb(skb);
> -		} else {
> -			kfree_skb(skb);
> -		}
> +		if (unlikely(!nskb))
> +			goto fail;
> +
> +		if (sk)
> +			skb_set_owner_w(nskb, sk);
> +		consume_skb(skb);
>  		skb = nskb;
>  	}
> -	if (skb &&
> -	    pskb_expand_head(skb, SKB_DATA_ALIGN(delta), 0, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
> -		kfree_skb(skb);
> -		skb = NULL;
> +	if (pskb_expand_head(skb, delta, 0, GFP_ATOMIC))
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	if (sk) {
sock_edemux check is still required here too.
> +		delta = skb_end_offset(skb) - osize;
> +		refcount_add(delta, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc);
> +		skb->truesize += delta;
>  	}
>  	return skb;
> +
> +fail:
> +	kfree_skb(skb);
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_expand_head);
>  
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index 950f1e7..6cbda43 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -2227,6 +2227,14 @@ void skb_set_owner_w(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_set_owner_w);
>  
> +bool is_skb_wmem(const struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	return skb->destructor == sock_wfree ||
> +	       skb->destructor == __sock_wfree ||
> +	       (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET) && skb->destructor == tcp_wfree);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(is_skb_wmem);
> +
>  static bool can_skb_orphan_partial(const struct sk_buff *skb)
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TLS_DEVICE
>