[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2845466.DzA3qLHUVI@silver>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:42:18 +0200
From: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
To: v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] 9p/trans_virtio: support larger msize values
On Montag, 20. September 2021 18:44:13 CEST Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> The virtio transport supports by default a 9p 'msize' of up to
> approximately 500 kB. This patch adds support for larger 'msize'
> values by resizing the amount of scatter/gather lists if required.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>
> ---
> net/9p/trans_virtio.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
> index 0db8de84bd51..4cb75f45aa15 100644
> --- a/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
> +++ b/net/9p/trans_virtio.c
> @@ -200,6 +200,31 @@ static struct virtqueue_sg *vq_sg_alloc(unsigned int
> nsgl) return vq_sg;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * vq_sg_resize - resize passed virtqueue scatter/gather lists to the
> passed + * amount of lists
> + * @_vq_sg: scatter/gather lists to be resized
> + * @nsgl: new amount of scatter/gather lists
> + */
> +static int vq_sg_resize(struct virtqueue_sg **_vq_sg, unsigned int nsgl)
> +{
> + struct virtqueue_sg *vq_sg;
> +
> + BUG_ON(!_vq_sg || !nsgl);
> + vq_sg = *_vq_sg;
> + if (vq_sg->nsgl == nsgl)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* lazy resize implementation for now */
> + vq_sg = vq_sg_alloc(nsgl);
> + if (!vq_sg)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + kfree(*_vq_sg);
> + *_vq_sg = vq_sg;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * p9_virtio_close - reclaim resources of a channel
> * @client: client instance
> @@ -771,6 +796,10 @@ p9_virtio_create(struct p9_client *client, const char
> *devname, char *args) struct virtio_chan *chan;
> int ret = -ENOENT;
> int found = 0;
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_NO_SG_CHAIN)
> + size_t npages;
> + size_t nsgl;
> +#endif
>
> if (devname == NULL)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -793,6 +822,34 @@ p9_virtio_create(struct p9_client *client, const char
> *devname, char *args) return ret;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * if user supplied an 'msize' option that's larger than what this
> + * transport supports by default, then try to allocate more sg lists
> + */
> + if (client->msize > client->trans_maxsize) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_NO_SG_CHAIN
> + pr_info("limiting 'msize' to %d because architecture does not "
> + "support chained scatter gather lists\n",
> + client->trans_maxsize);
> +#else
> + npages = DIV_ROUND_UP(client->msize, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (npages > chan->p9_max_pages)
> + npages = chan->p9_max_pages;
> + nsgl = DIV_ROUND_UP(npages, SG_USER_PAGES_PER_LIST);
> + if (nsgl > chan->vq_sg->nsgl) {
> + /*
> + * if resize fails, no big deal, then just
> + * continue with default msize instead
> + */
> + if (!vq_sg_resize(&chan->vq_sg, nsgl)) {
> + client->trans_maxsize =
> + PAGE_SIZE *
> + ((nsgl * SG_USER_PAGES_PER_LIST) - 3);
> + }
> + }
Maybe an ...
} else {
pr_info(...);
}
would be useful here to explain the user why transport refrained from
increasing its max size even though user's msize option demanded it.
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_NO_SG_CHAIN */
> + }
> +
> client->trans = (void *)chan;
> client->status = Connected;
> chan->client = client;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists