[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210923024944.GA446@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 19:49:44 -0700
From: Muhammad Falak Wani <mwani@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next] libbpf: Use sysconf to simplify
libbpf_num_possible_cpus
> > This approach is unfortunately broken, see also commit e00c7b216f34 ("bpf: fix
> > multiple issues in selftest suite and samples") for more details:
>
> Oh, that predates me. Thanks, Daniel!
Thank you Daniel for the context.
>
> Sorry, Muhammad, seems like current implementation is there for a
> reason and will have to stay. Thanks a lot for working on this,
> though. Hopefully you can help with other issues, though.
>
No worries at all, it was a good experience for me & I will
try to help here and there for sure.
Thank you again!
-mfrw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists