lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OS0PR01MB592208B398BED9F36677B59B86A39@OS0PR01MB5922.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Sep 2021 19:22:59 +0000
From:   Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
To:     Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" 
        <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC/PATCH 03/18] ravb: Initialize GbEthernet dmac

HI Sergei,

> Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 03/18] ravb: Initialize GbEthernet dmac
> 
> On 9/23/21 5:07 PM, Biju Das wrote:
> 
> > Initialize GbEthernet dmac found on RZ/G2L SoC.
> > This patch also renames ravb_rcar_dmac_init to ravb_dmac_init_rcar to
> > be consistent with the naming convention used in sh_eth driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h      |  4 ++
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 84
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> > index 0ce0c13ef8cb..bee05e6fb815 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
> > @@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ enum ravb_reg {
> >  	RQC3	= 0x00A0,
> >  	RQC4	= 0x00A4,
> >  	RPC	= 0x00B0,
> > +	RTC	= 0x00B4,	/* RZ/G2L only */
> 
>    My gen3 manual says the regiuster exists there...
> 
> >  	UFCW	= 0x00BC,
> >  	UFCS	= 0x00C0,
> >  	UFCV0	= 0x00C4,
> > @@ -156,6 +157,7 @@ enum ravb_reg {
> >  	TIS	= 0x037C,
> >  	ISS	= 0x0380,
> >  	CIE	= 0x0384,	/* R-Car Gen3 only */
> > +	RIC3	= 0x0388,	/* RZ/G2L only */
> 
>    Again, this register (along with RIS3) exists on gen3...
> 
> >  	GCCR	= 0x0390,
> >  	GMTT	= 0x0394,
> >  	GPTC	= 0x0398,
> > @@ -956,6 +958,8 @@ enum RAVB_QUEUE {
> >
> >  #define RX_BUF_SZ	(2048 - ETH_FCS_LEN + sizeof(__sum16))
> >
> > +#define RGETH_RX_BUFF_MAX 8192
> > +
> >  struct ravb_tstamp_skb {
> >  	struct list_head list;
> >  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > index 2422e74d9b4f..54c4d31a6950 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > @@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ static int ravb_config(struct net_device *ndev)
> >  	return error;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void ravb_rgeth_set_rate(struct net_device *ndev) {
> > +	/* Place holder */
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void ravb_set_rate(struct net_device *ndev)  {
> >  	struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); @@ -217,6 +222,11 @@
> > static int ravb_tx_free(struct net_device *ndev, int q, bool
> free_txed_only)
> >  	return free_num;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void ravb_rx_ring_free_rgeth(struct net_device *ndev, int q) {
> > +	/* Place holder */
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void ravb_rx_ring_free(struct net_device *ndev, int q)  {
> >  	struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); @@ -283,6 +293,11 @@
> > static void ravb_ring_free(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
> >  	priv->tx_skb[q] = NULL;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void ravb_rx_ring_format_rgeth(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
> > +{
> > +	/* Place holder */
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void ravb_rx_ring_format(struct net_device *ndev, int q)  {
> >  	struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); @@ -356,6 +371,12 @@
> > static void ravb_ring_format(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
> >  	desc->dptr = cpu_to_le32((u32)priv->tx_desc_dma[q]);
> >  }
> >
> > +static void *ravb_rgeth_alloc_rx_desc(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
> > +{
> > +	/* Place holder */
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void *ravb_alloc_rx_desc(struct net_device *ndev, int q)  {
> >  	struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); @@ -426,6 +447,11 @@
> > static int ravb_ring_init(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
> >  	return -ENOMEM;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void ravb_rgeth_emac_init(struct net_device *ndev) {
> > +	/* Place holder */
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void ravb_rcar_emac_init(struct net_device *ndev)  {
> >  	/* Receive frame limit set register */ @@ -461,7 +487,32 @@ static
> > void ravb_emac_init(struct net_device *ndev)
> >  	info->emac_init(ndev);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void ravb_rcar_dmac_init(struct net_device *ndev)
> > +static void ravb_dmac_init_rgeth(struct net_device *ndev) {
> > +	/* Set AVB RX */
> > +	ravb_write(ndev, 0x60000000, RCR);
> > +
> > +	/* Set Max Frame Length (RTC) */
> > +	ravb_write(ndev, 0x7ffc0000 | RGETH_RX_BUFF_MAX, RTC);
> 
>    Should be init'ed on gen3 as well?

Rcar gen3 has separate initialization routine, This part is RZ/G2L specific, the buffer size is different.

> 
> > +
> > +	/* Set FIFO size */
> > +	ravb_write(ndev, 0x00222200, TGC);
> > +
> > +	ravb_write(ndev, 0, TCCR);
> > +
> > +	/* Frame receive */
> > +	ravb_write(ndev, RIC0_FRE0, RIC0);
> > +	/* Disable FIFO full warning */
> > +	ravb_write(ndev, 0x0, RIC1);
> > +	/* Receive FIFO full error, descriptor empty */
> > +	ravb_write(ndev, RIC2_QFE0 | RIC2_RFFE, RIC2);
> > +
> > +	ravb_write(ndev, 0x0, RIC3);
> 
>    Should be init'ed on gen3 as well? Matter of a separate patch, I can do
> it prolly...

OK. May be after completing RZ/G2L, I can investigate on gen3 stuff or If you have R-Car board and confirm this change 
Won't break anything on R-Car gen3, you can submit the patch.

Regards,
Biju


> 
> [...]
> 
> MBR, Sergey

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ