netdev - [net-next 06/12] net/mlx5e: Check action fwd/drop flag exists also for nic flows

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210924184808.796968-7-saeed@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 24 Sep 2021 11:48:02 -0700
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>,
        Maor Dickman <maord@...dia.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: [net-next 06/12] net/mlx5e: Check action fwd/drop flag exists also for nic flows

From: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>

The driver should add offloaded rules with either a fwd or drop action.
The check existed in parsing fdb flows but not when parsing nic flows.
Move the test into actions_match_supported() which is called for
checking nic flows and fdb flows.

Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Maor Dickman <maord@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index 3646e88b6401..c86fc59c645f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -3189,6 +3189,12 @@ static bool actions_match_supported(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
 	ct_flow = flow_flag_test(flow, CT) && !ct_clear;
 	actions = flow->attr->action;
 
+	if (!(actions &
+	      (MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST | MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_DROP))) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Rule must have at least one forward/drop action");
+		return false;
+	}
+
 	if (mlx5e_is_eswitch_flow(flow)) {
 		if (flow->attr->esw_attr->split_count && ct_flow &&
 		    !MLX5_CAP_GEN(flow->attr->esw_attr->in_mdev, reg_c_preserve)) {
@@ -4077,13 +4083,6 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
-	if (!(attr->action &
-	      (MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST | MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_DROP))) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
-				   "Rule must have at least one forward/drop action");
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-	}
-
 	if (esw_attr->split_count > 0 && !mlx5_esw_has_fwd_fdb(priv->mdev)) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
 				   "current firmware doesn't support split rule for port mirroring");
-- 
2.31.1