netdev - Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Don't always treat modem stop events as crashes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Sep 2021 10:59:47 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     pillair@...eaurora.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        govinds@...eaurora.org, kuabhs@...omium.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        youghand@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Don't always treat modem stop events as crashes

Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> writes:

> Quoting pillair@...eaurora.org (2021-09-21 22:35:34)
>> On 9/5/21 4:04 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>> > +static int ath10k_snoc_modem_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long
> [...]
>>
>> > +
>>
>> > +          return NOTIFY_OK;
>>
>> > +}
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for posting the patch. It would be preferable to use a different flag
>> instead of ATH10K_SNOC_FLAG_UNREGISTERING,
>>
>> since we are not unloading the ath10k driver.

Weird, I don't see pillair's email on patchwork[1] and not in the ath10k
list either. Was it sent as HTML or something?

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20210905210400.1157870-1-swboyd@chromium.org/

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches