lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Sep 2021 18:02:53 +0800
From:   butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Karsten Keil <isdn@...ux-pingi.de>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bluez mailing list <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: There is an array-index-out-bounds bug in detach_capi_ctr in drivers/isdn/capi/kcapi.c

> When I last touched the capi code, I tried to remove it all, but we then
> left it in the kernel because the bluetooth cmtp code can still theoretically
> use it.
>
> May I ask how you managed to run into this? Did you find the bug through
> inspection first and then produce it using cmtp, or did you actually use
> cmtp?

I fuzz the bluez system and find a crash to analyze it and reproduce it.

> If the only purpose of cmtp is now to be a target for exploits, then I
> would suggest we consider removing both cmtp and capi for
> good after backporting your fix to stable kernels. Obviously
> if it turns out that someone actually uses cmtp and/or capi, we
> should not remove it.
>
Yes, I think this should be feasible.

Regards
  butt3rflyh4ck.


-- 
Active Defense Lab of Venustech

Powered by blists - more mailing lists