netdev - [PATCH net-next 6/6 v7] net: dsa: rtl8366: Drop and depromote pointless prints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210925225929.2082046-7-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 26 Sep 2021 00:59:29 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@...lfence.com>,
        DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
        Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/6 v7] net: dsa: rtl8366: Drop and depromote pointless prints

We don't need a message for every VLAN association, dbg
is fine. The message about adding the DSA or CPU
port to a VLAN is directly misleading, this is perfectly
fine.

Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@...lfence.com>
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
---
ChangeLog v6->v7:
- Fix a small whitespace error in one of the debug messages.
- Collect Alvin's review tag.
ChangeLog v5->v6:
- No changes just resending with the rest of the
  patches.
ChangeLog v4->v5:
- Collect Florians review tag.
ChangeLog v1->v4:
- New patch to deal with confusing messages and too talkative
  DSA bridge.
---
 drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
index f815cd16ad48..bdb8d8d34880 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
@@ -318,12 +318,9 @@ int rtl8366_vlan_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
-	dev_info(smi->dev, "add VLAN %d on port %d, %s, %s\n",
-		 vlan->vid, port, untagged ? "untagged" : "tagged",
-		 pvid ? " PVID" : "no PVID");
-
-	if (dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
-		dev_err(smi->dev, "port is DSA or CPU port\n");
+	dev_dbg(smi->dev, "add VLAN %d on port %d, %s, %s\n",
+		vlan->vid, port, untagged ? "untagged" : "tagged",
+		pvid ? "PVID" : "no PVID");
 
 	member |= BIT(port);
 
@@ -356,7 +353,7 @@ int rtl8366_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
 	struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
 	int ret, i;
 
-	dev_info(smi->dev, "del VLAN %04x on port %d\n", vlan->vid, port);
+	dev_dbg(smi->dev, "del VLAN %d on port %d\n", vlan->vid, port);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < smi->num_vlan_mc; i++) {
 		struct rtl8366_vlan_mc vlanmc;
-- 
2.31.1