[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210925132311.2040272-7-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 15:23:11 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@...lfence.com>,
Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/6 v6] net: dsa: rtl8366: Drop and depromote pointless prints
We don't need a message for every VLAN association, dbg
is fine. The message about adding the DSA or CPU
port to a VLAN is directly misleading, this is perfectly
fine.
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@...lfence.com>
Cc: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>
Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
---
ChangeLog v5->v6:
- No changes just resending with the rest of the
patches.
ChangeLog v4->v5:
- Collect Florians review tag.
ChangeLog v1->v4:
- New patch to deal with confusing messages and too talkative
DSA bridge.
---
drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c | 11 ++++-------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
index f815cd16ad48..bb6189aedcd4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
@@ -318,12 +318,9 @@ int rtl8366_vlan_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
return ret;
}
- dev_info(smi->dev, "add VLAN %d on port %d, %s, %s\n",
- vlan->vid, port, untagged ? "untagged" : "tagged",
- pvid ? " PVID" : "no PVID");
-
- if (dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
- dev_err(smi->dev, "port is DSA or CPU port\n");
+ dev_dbg(smi->dev, "add VLAN %d on port %d, %s, %s\n",
+ vlan->vid, port, untagged ? "untagged" : "tagged",
+ pvid ? " PVID" : "no PVID");
member |= BIT(port);
@@ -356,7 +353,7 @@ int rtl8366_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
int ret, i;
- dev_info(smi->dev, "del VLAN %04x on port %d\n", vlan->vid, port);
+ dev_dbg(smi->dev, "del VLAN %d on port %d\n", vlan->vid, port);
for (i = 0; i < smi->num_vlan_mc; i++) {
struct rtl8366_vlan_mc vlanmc;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists