lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d6c1a5d-fcaa-4af9-0ed8-51920c237bde@omp.ru>
Date:   Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:28:20 +0300
From:   Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To:     Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>,
        Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 13/18] ravb: Add rx_ring_free function support for
 GbEthernet

On 9/23/21 5:08 PM, Biju Das wrote:

> This patch adds rx_ring_free function support for GbEthernet
> found on RZ/G2L SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index 2c375002ebcb..038af36141bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -236,7 +236,27 @@ static int ravb_tx_free(struct net_device *ndev, int q, bool free_txed_only)
>  
>  static void ravb_rx_ring_free_rgeth(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
>  {
> -	/* Place holder */
> +	struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	unsigned int ring_size;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	if (!priv->rgeth_rx_ring[q])

   Is the network control queue present on your hardware at all? Perhaps we can ignore q for now?

> +		return;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_ring[q]; i++) {
> +		struct ravb_rx_desc *desc = &priv->rgeth_rx_ring[q][i];

   Looks like patch #12 should come after this one, not before...

> +
> +		if (!dma_mapping_error(ndev->dev.parent,
> +				       le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr)))
> +			dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent,
> +					 le32_to_cpu(desc->dptr),
> +					 RGETH_RX_BUFF_MAX,
> +					 DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> +	}
> +	ring_size = sizeof(struct ravb_rx_desc) * (priv->num_rx_ring[q] + 1);
> +	dma_free_coherent(ndev->dev.parent, ring_size, priv->rgeth_rx_ring[q],
> +			  priv->rx_desc_dma[q]);
> +	priv->rgeth_rx_ring[q] = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  static void ravb_rx_ring_free(struct net_device *ndev, int q)

MBR, Sergey

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ