[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1fEuFsQVY9b1oGdTOHzr8pu9wvrSBCMn2iOvgWqtHNnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:15:45 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] qcom_scm: hide Kconfig symbol
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:52 PM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Mon 27 Sep 08:22 PDT 2021, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > - To avoid a circular dependency chain involving RESET_CONTROLLER
> > and PINCTRL_SUNXI, change the 'depends on RESET_CONTROLLER' in
> > the latter one to 'select'.
>
> Can you please help me understand why this is part of the same patch?
This can be done as a preparatory patch if we decide to do it this way,
for the review it seemed better to spell out that this is required.
I still hope that we can avoid adding another 'select RESET_CONTROLLER'
if someone can figure out what to do instead.
The problem here is that QCOM_SCM selects RESET_CONTROLLER,
and turning that into 'depends on' would in turn mean that any driver that
wants to select QCOM_SCM would have to have the same RESET_CONTROLLER
dependency.
An easier option might be to find a way to build QCOM_SCM without
RESET_CONTROLLER for compile testing purposes. I don't know
what would break from that.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists