[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2-F-vAL5-gewVh3JvnD1a9yXWYLKN9fi6CEe86Hnhn+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:59:27 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Voon Weifeng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] net: stmmac: fix gcc-10 -Wrestrict warning
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:27 PM Russell King (Oracle)
<linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:02:44PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> This looks rather weird. rx_irq[] is defined as:
>
> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
>
> If "i" were to become MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES, then the above code overlows
> the array.
>
> So while this may stop gcc-10 complaining, I'd argue that making the
> new test ">=" rather than ">" would have also made it look correct.
Indeed, thanks for pointing this out. I have sent a follow-up with
that change now.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists